A special user group was recently created on the FA forums called "miserable users" and it effectively made the forums unusable for the people in it. It was spotted because it was accidentaly appearing on the staff page after the wrong check box was ticked. Two people who voiced legitimate and considered criticisms of genuine issues with FA were put into this group and FA main-site/forums administrator, Carenath, was responsible for making the group and putting them in. His response has, quite literally, been: FUCK YOU and he has not so much as apologized at the time of posting.
As far as can be told, he went behind the back of the rest of the FA staff in doing this.
This has mostly unfolded in a FA forums thread and in the course of it, one of the people who been put in miserable users was banned for breaking a non-existent rule, and then unbanned. The thread was also locked twice (presumably by Carenath) and then unlocked by another admin. Dragoneer viewed the thread at least twice but did not respond to it.
OP:
If you want to shut people up for criticizing FA, ban them and come clean that you banned them. Don't dump them (Rossyfox and Accountability) into a usergroup that blocks access to the forum and prevents them from posting/viewing threads: http://forums.furaffinity.net/showgroups.php Your groups are literally admins, super moderators, moderators, and gagged dissenters. That's ridiculous.
You essentially banned them but you don't want their names to be in red and crossed out so it's far less obvious you just wanted to shut them up- their old posts that stop on the 23rd and 24th still remain but there is absolutely no indication of the fact that they've been "disappeared."
This is what drives the pervasive distrust on this site. Maybe if this nonsense wasn't pulled all the time you wouldn't have such an adversarial reaction to what you think is "every little thing." Kinda like how there hasn't been much talk about what's going on with the site. A few journals and LJ post from Dragoneer a week or so after the december attacks, a (now also disappeared) post about the 6-year old FA's future, and a whole hell of a lot of distraction/funny video journals from the main admin. The only discussion left is basically that of how to make the old/current site look new.
Hell, if you even admitted that you were trying to hush up two problematic (read: critical) users without anyone noticing, that would help, let alone apologizing. Moves like that might help improve the negative perception of FA staff when it comes to people who have an issue with how things run here. However, it will be swept under the rug and denied, that much can be counted on. And that's the problem.
By the way, you've been looking for an excuse to get rid of me from these forums. So here it is, a coward's excuse. Unless of course you want to be even more of a sorry milquetoast bunch and put me in the same limpwristed killfile as Rossy and Accountability. Be my guest.
http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/90871-Miserable-Users-
There was no legitimate reason for using this, except to make the forums unusable for the people in the group:
Oh wow. I've seen another forum with that vB plugin.
That's just... wow.
For those that don't know what it is: http://www.vbulletin.org/forum/showthread.php?t=93258
When classed as miserable, a member suffers ;
1. Slow response (time delay) on every page (20 to 60 seconds default).
2. A chance they will get the "server busy" message (50% by default).
3. A chance that no search facilities will be available (75% by default).
4. A chance they will get redirected to another preset page (25% & homepage by default).
5. A chance they will simply get a blank page (25% by default).
6. Post flood limit increased by a defined factor (10 times by default).
7. If they get past all this okay, then they will be served up their proper page.
Classy
http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/90871-Miserable-Users?p=2342734&viewfull=1#post2342734-
Reactions from other FA staff indicates none of them seemed to be aware:
[...] Honestly I really don't know much about this, other than it's bullshit and that it was tested on here. I'm learning about this as you guys are.
http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/90871-Miserable-Users?p=2342936&viewfull=1#post2342936I too am curious and was not aware this happened. =/
http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/90871-Miserable-Users?p=2343022&viewfull=1#post2343022demand an explanation as much as anyone else. Half an hour after the group was removed and I still have no idea while it happened. And neither do Ratte or Summercat, site admins.
As much as we've talked about 'communicating' as forum staff, someone just went over everyone's heads here, and considering that it was an admin-level feature/add on, it was probably senior staff.
Moderator IRC chat is dead. Nothing posted about it anywhere else. I'm waiting, and the longer I wait, the less I'm willing to stick around for an explanation.
http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/90871-Miserable-Users?p=2342987&viewfull=1#post2342987I want an explanation.
http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/90871-Miserable-Users?p=2342932&viewfull=1#post2342932-
An attempt at explanation came from admin Summercat:
Right now, it's a "We dun goofed". The plug-in in question was being tested to see if it was compatible with the forum software setup we have. It was never decided to implement it fully as an available feature.
http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/90871-Miserable-Users?p=2342934&viewfull=1#post2342934As for why those two, they were chosen as accounts from a problomatic thread as part of a test case. In my (personal) opinion, both accounts are close to being removed for other reasons and violations.
http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/90871-Miserable-Users?p=2342979&viewfull=1#post2342979[in response to being asked who it was] Not saying. That's not really something I feel comfortable sharing, so I'm passing the buck to the staff member in question, and Dragoneer. Once they say something...
http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/90871-Miserable-Users?p=2343017&viewfull=1#post2343017On IRC, he again refused to say who it was:
<KesPillowgirl> Summercat: it's been three hours. whoever's done this isn't interested in responsibility
<Summercat> I'm not naming names because I don't feel I should be naming names at this point.
[...]
<Bobsergal> Yeah but you know who did it now
<Bobsergal> but you're not saying
<Summercat> Yup.
http://pastebin.com/YZfcGbwt-
Accountability, having been removed from the miserable users group then made this post:
You seem to forget that these are the same users that donated $16,000+ so FA could buy two new, very powerful servers two years ago. FA didn't want that much. They were planning on getting $2,000. But the users stepped up and donated 7x what was expected. You seem to forget these are the same users that (when donations are working) happily donate money every month so FA can stay online, in a server cabinet twice as large as they actually need or use.
As long as FA runs on donations, FA has every obligation to please the users. And it shouldn't be because they have to, they should want to.
http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/90871-Miserable-Users?p=2343187&viewfull=1#post2343187This resulted in them being immediately banned.
-
Eventually Carenath skulked out of hiding:
The short-and-sweet is that, I installed it to test on the live forum as another level of punishment to apply to particular users where a straight-out ban would be taken far worse in a particular situation. I choose those two users in particular as they were going to be banned anyway for other reasons and wanted to see if they could be subtly persuaded to leave as a ban in that situation might incite further drama and make things worse.
http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/90871-Miserable-Users?p=2343323&viewfull=1#post2343323Naturally, people called on him, in the thread, to resign and this was his response, on twitter:
http://twitter.com/carenathziroth/status/32335924197064704-
Ratte said in the thread (relying what she'd been told) that the reason that Accountability had been banned was because they'd been using a proxy. It was pointed out that there is no such rule against this and she unbanned him. Summercat then explained himself:
RE the Accountability account:
Group held accounts are not welcome on FA's forums. However, in a moment of epic fail that I will be beating myself up for a while, I jumped the gun and acted on the circumstantial evidence showing Accountability to be a multi-user account. Due to the usage of a proxy system, we are unable to verify that the Accountability account is actually multi-user, again, aside from said circumstantial evidence (personality shifts between posts and topics, different writing styles).
A future rule about using proxies on FAF is being considered, but until that point, there is nothing in the rules about using proxies - and when such a rule gets implimented, I'm going to heavily suggest that there be a grace period to allow for those who refuse to access FAF without a proxy service to list off goodbyes.
In addition, I'm suggesting (and implementing for myself as of right now) a new policy on banning on the forums, that requires another admin to agree/verify that the ban is needed. I fucked up, the above is how I fucked up - and this is how I'm going to try to make certain I don't fuck up like that again.
(PS: To those that care, feel free to add this as an example of me being a bad mod.)
http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/90871-Miserable-Users?p=2343414&viewfull=1#post2343414In response to people suggesting that it was simply an excuse to try and shut accountability up:
Specifically, we are being hampered in our ability to see if Accountability is, indeed, a group account, because the account uses a proxy system. Further, if a banned user is attempting to evade a ban by using a proxy service, we would also have a hard time proving that it is indeed the same user.
It is less that we're doing this to target a specific user, so much as the case brought attention to a whole category of potential situations.
http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/90871-Miserable-Users?p=2343490&viewfull=1#post2343490Note that he tries to speak for the staff "we" in the latter post above, and says a rule is being considered but pre-empts it in the first one with "when". AFAICS he didn't respond to people pointing out it was paranoid rubbish.
-
At this point the thread was locked and some posts in it were apparently deleted. An archive of the thread is here:
http://clanspum.net/~pi/fa_2011/A thread started to try and continue discussion was locked:
http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/90903-Miserable-Users-redux-
On /furi/ someone had this response to Carenath:
http://i54.tinypic.com/o6w3v7.pngThis is what Carenath says on his FA main-site profile:
I value Honour, Honesty and Loyalty.
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/carenathzirothHe owns the FA forums server.