Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
If you're talking about the Adobe thing, that really shouldn't bear any explanation.Yeah I was. I think it's another stupid fucking saving face thing. "HEH, LOOK, WE DON'T SUPPORT PIRATING!!"
In the case of tearing I am sure they will be able to prosecute, but you didn't mention that originally.I'm just going off of what I've heard. I've heard vaginal bruising and tearing.
From what I've read, spaying is an alternative to euthanasia that usually cures it.I think open pyometra [pus is actually coming out of the vagina] can be cured with medicine, but closed pyometra [pus isn't coming out] is very dangerous and vets will recommend taking the uterus out.
Pyometra is a common infection in unspayed dogs which is unrelated to sexual activityOf course, but pyometra is an infection caused by hormonal changes in the body. Zoophiles wait until their bitch is in heat before they plow it ["because she's willing"] and this can cause infections, pyometra and false pregnancies due to the hormonal changes.
Vaginal bruising is normal during intercourseI'm sure it's a normal occurrence for a dog to get a bruised vagina and vaginal tearing during mating. Nope.
I take it there wasn't any evidence of the accusations of the dogs being killed from sexual abuse?Yes there is.
1) At what point is "old age" a good reason for euthanizing a dog?The male was put down out of pity because his sister was being put down due to pyometra. He had also suffered from prostate and penis issues.
Hopefully they court can get some order keeping him away from animals because most likely he will offend again.If you look at Rodox_Video's latest link, they say that if they can prove he injured the female through sex, he won't be getting that dog back. I think they already have proof though because she had vaginal bruising?? Hm.. I hope he can get an animal owning ban.
and a mongler.
Do you literally not have that voice inside your head that says "this is a shitpost, don't click the button"?No, not that voice
[...]the "look but don't touch" rule.
Except it doesn't even seem FD_2 members are even punished for breaking that rule.
At least it doesn't appear like he's trying to cover it up this time.
Also who wants to bet they're going to get one of those ridiculous artsy cakes (like on that TV show) with something furfaggy on it?A sculpture of a dragon holding a glass orb
If that's true and the victim tells the cops he may have just opened himself for investigation too.Yeah it made me sick to my stomach. I think it was in a shout-chat between him and maybe.. punkbawkchicken? I can't remember.
And 'the boy'? Are you talking about the kid that your husband supposedly assaulted? Why should the kid tell the truth to YOU, the partner of someone he says assaulted him?
If all said and done is true, then that boy is probably terrified of YOU as well.
...And you do realize that witness tampering, right?
if they're willing to do this, how much do you want to be they also wrote a scrapper for user's notes?I was about to ask this too. It's extremely paranoid and definitely something they didn't want out.. 'cause they redirected it to Youtube. :\
His FA account:Skittlesofdoom isn't the victim. I can't remember if the victim has an account or not but I remember Skittlesofdoom bragging about how he "interrogated" the child and how the child is lying about where he was diddled or some shit.
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/formichivemind/
No real heavy details in the story yet, one could speculate his "mate" might be this guy
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/skittlesofdoom/
Could this possibly be the victim's account?
Speaking of this sort of thing, I noted that someone on FA recently received, without warning, a temporary ban for uploading a photo-manipulation with nipples in it. The journal they made on returning is a good example of how this sort of thing alienates the community that uses the site:Well if it was a real photo of a real woman with real nipples, then yeah that's actually against the site rules... but suspending someone without warning like that? Not the usual way they do things..Quote from: ECmajorThanks for the warning before you hatched your ridiculously overbearing judgement on me, FA mods! -.-
All the times i proudly defended this site and those who administrate it when people claimed it was run unprofessionally were misplaced... and now i know this, so i won't bother in the future.
Telling me my submission was against the rules and removing it would have sufficed just fine, thanks! There are certainly much worse things on this site than 6-pixel wide nipples anyway. Go bother them.
...
Anyway, yup, back! Now i can access notes and things and resume normalcy. Though now i have to go to work... uploading new art will wait until tomorrow.
http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2347685/
There's probably now a few less people who will go "But It's free!" in future.
FA cannot communicate with it's users. They typically use the worst ways to announce things (Forum announcements and frontpage news items). A whopping 300 people have read the forum announcement, and the Fender news items are likely ignored by most people as they are filled with stupid shit and advertisements for FA: United 95% of the time.Yeah, it's not hard to do a small announcement. I mean, even if it were up for 2 days it would get the message out, but instead FA seems to want an influx of TT's submitted and people complaining about how they didn't know/how it's unfair, etc, and a lot of people are going to get in admin trouble because they didn't happen to stroll over to Fender's front-page shouts or the FA forums. Hell, I found out about the new rule through someone commenting on a submission saying something about "new avatar rules" so I went to the AUP and didn't see anything.. then the guy linked me to the "Knowledgebase" where it's shown :\ It's ridiculous.
The thing you need to remember most about the Administration of FA: It's creed is "Do not cause a stir/be confrontational if you can help it."FA is a big site with many users, Dragoneer needs to learn that there will always be confrontation and sometimes you just gotta do shit and deal with the backlash of "dat's not fayuurr
If you look at a lot of their actions with the mindset that the LAST thing they want to do is be confrontational/cause a stir (because that leads to the ever dreaded DRAMA) then a lot of it will make a lot more sense.
"Looking through FA today several days after the ban it seems if they're mostly clothed it's OK. This of course means every single one of them will look even more identical, because all they'll do is recolor the bra.Are you talking about icons like these?: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/5741761/ 'cause no, those aren't allowed.