Topics

1

Non Topics / Was re: something useful (Clayton remix)

« on: June 23, 2011, 07:09:58 pm »

IDK why this is such a big damn deal to Neer and Arshes.
People ask for free copies all the time

2

Scandal! / Banning People for "Harassment"??

« on: August 01, 2010, 12:25:23 pm »

I was asked to post this here.
  So as some of you may know, a user on FurAffinity by the name of "Cadbury" recently posted photos of his surgery to get staples in his back removed from when he was run over by a truck. Several trolls and others got upset over him posting photos of the staples and reported them. They were deleted.

  Cadbury then rages and flips out and creates a journal telling the admins to "suck a dick and fuck off". His account got a 24 hour suspension [temp ban]. A few users[namely Crovirus, Jude-Prudence and Amusa-Kohrl] who have known Cadbury because he is a well-known zoophile, go over to his journal and rag on him, telling him they wish he'd have been killed and other things. A couple whiteknights rush over and tell the users off. Cadbury's journal was then slammed with information proving he fucks dogs. More rage is created.

  Cadbury then returns from his suspension and deletes the journal. He then goes after user Ziggy's journal: http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/872403/ that was created a year ago over a note that Cadbury had sent to Ziggy [his quotes are bolded]. In the comments, Ziggy says that it was Cadbury who had sent the note. Cadbury flips out and trolls Ziggy's journal and Crovirus's artwork.

  Amusa-Kohrl goes to comment on Cadbury's new journal only to find they were blocked. Amusa then goes to their old photography account [which was emptied, not newly created] to comment. Admin ChasevRocket bans Amusa's account, their photography account and a club account[Dr_Percival_Cox] and then sends them an email saying they've been permanently banned for "sockpuppeting and harassment". Chase then deletes all the inflammatory comments on Crovirus's artwork [from Cadbury I believe], Cadbury's recent journal,  and the comments identifying him as the dogfucker in Ziggy's journal.

  Now. I find this all to be very strange. I've been banned for harassment before. CrimsonTheMastiff [zoobuddy of Cadbury] has been banned for harassment and sockpuppeting before, Cadbury has been banned for harassment before. None of us got perma bans for this. Not one. Only 48-72 hour long temp bans.
In order to "sockpuppet", I believe a user has to create an alternate account JUST to troll another user. Amusa did not do this. They had used their old photography account that they had wiped because dogfuckers were asking them to take explicit photos of the dogs at the shelter Amusa worked at. I'm guessing Chase saw this as a sockpuppet account because it was wiped.

  I think there's some bias here with Chase. If any of you know Chase's past - he was outed as a dogfucker [but apparently doesn't do the dirty anymore with dogs]. I have personally spoken to him and talked to him about a user on the site that have openly stated they fuck their dog [Sparklemotion]. Chase went so far as to go deep into my shouts [back a year or so] and find the shout in which S.M talks about it.
All S.M got was a slap on the wrist even though he has talked about fucking his dog numerous times.

  An admin cannot perma ban someone just because they don't like that person. Me, Crimson and Cadbury all got temp bans. [C.T.M was sockpuppeting too, remember this], yet Amusa gets perma'd.
I think that if you're going to have an admin on your team that is biased towards fellow zoobuddies, do not have them as staff. This is bullshit.

Lol check out Cad's new journal - he's ragging on Crovirus again. Too bad it'll only get him a slap on the wrist.

3

Other Topics / The Ever Popular Zoophilia = Cruelty Debate

« on: April 16, 2010, 07:59:53 pm »

I was asked to join and post this here so here we go.
This is an actual conversation with a user on FA who [I think they or their friend] works with rehabbing dogs.

Many dogs who are taken out of dog fuckers homes to have to be put down actually but uh....if they hadn't been used for sex they wouldn't have the behavioral and mental issues that make them unsuitable as pets...uh....durrrrrr? To be honest, the dog is better off put down

Friend of mine took in a dog who's owner I had put away and he already had another one abused by a family member of his (who was also arrested)....anyone who says having sex with a dog is consensual and doesn't hurt them needs to be fucked with a three foot spiked dildo...the male dog needs to be muzzled at all times even after 3 years of trainers and kind treatment (if you mistakenly brush the underside of his stomach he starts crying and will shake until he goes nuts and bites everything in reach yelping, it's horrible) and god forbid you touch the female's hind end, she urinates and falls over screaming despite there being no more physical damage (it's been about 2 years now). I hate people.

that male dog I just wrote about, that was a "doing the fucking" case...he's otherwise such a sweet boy at this point who loves people (he was super dominant and aggressive towards people initially, no surprise) but can't go out for walks, isn't allowed to have human contact apart from his owner and a few select guests who can "speak dog" and know how to act around him, it's just sad.

physical issues just brush the surface of the abuse, it's the mental ones that make for a dangerous dog and are more harmful over the long run. If you ever need to "convince" someone dog fucking is bad (and you're not there in person to beat the ever living shit out of them" I've found the best route to go is the allergy route. Even if someone's fucked their dog 100s of times they can get a spontaneous allergic reaction to the fluids that sends them into anaphylactic shock and they can die. Not to mention er, sensitive areas blowing up like a bloody red balloons that can be permanently scarred or "broken" for life. Downside of course is it can go the other way around too, with the animal getting the reaction spontaneously.

gay = dog fucker...I hate those people...there is no logic in that argument yet for some reason it always ends up with the sane person arguing with a brick wall that doesn't listen to the science you give them....now, it is comparable to going after kids, they're actually very closely relate, that whole belief the victim is consenting thing. Now, there are people who are wired wrong to lust after kids or animals. What makes them good or bad people is the ability to control it and seek help if they need it. I know a zoophile who would never DARE tough an animal sexually. He is sexually and emotionally attracted to dogs, he loves them and therefore knows how it could damage one if he acted on his impulses. He does not own a dog for this reason and only interacts with dogs when there are other people around, also goes to therapy and is living a happy productive life. While I generally keep my pets away from admitted zoophiles he is permitted to interact with my dog (always supervised even though I know he'd be fine...I'm paranoid)

That male dog can't go on walks because he's so sensitive, if the wrong person made the wrong motion he may lunge and being a large dog even muzzled he could do damage which would lead to other problems. He does not like certain types of men (anyone over about 5 10 gets a growl) and requires a very dominant personality in someone female (they need to know what body signals to give him or he'll be very aggressive and pushy). He's surprisingly well mannered with children, not that he's been giving a change to be around them much. All of his and most of the female dog's exercise is done in a fenced yard or on a treadmill. The female can go out on walks with a cart (she pulls this little wagon around, she'll even pull kids, it's adorable) with her frame and harness that makes it near impossibly to accidentally brush her hind end. She's perfectly fine unless you touch anywhere near her tail or grab her muzzle and hold her head (her front teeth were knocked on for...well, use your imagination). She's still got molars and is muzzled in public as well just in case. With with a couple years of careful marker training if you give her an "it's okay" command before you touch her rear area she'll usually still pee in fear but won't scream or bite and she can be harnessed without issue provided your hand doesn't touch her. Children can pet her head and shoulder when she's with her cart and she'll take treats from them (she always gets a treat from her passengers lol).

foreign "material" inside a mare is almost always bad and for some reason it seems that mares can be allergic to anything (I worked with one who was allergic to my saliva, I sneezed on her one time and she broke out in hives...$600 vet bills and tests later we figured out that she was allergic to human saliva and sweat but only when she was in heat WTF). I mean with some competition mares who travel around a lot and show frequently they're actually stitched close to make sure that they don't get things in there since one mistake can take them out of the show ring for months and/or make them sterile which sucks if she's a champion.

I cut out everything I said to just leave the bestiality things.
Enjoy!