weasyl is a competently run art site with more features than FA at the expense of a smaller community. what more can they do?
like honestly what features are they missing? so long as FA has the lions share of the activity weasyl is gonna trail behind, even if they implement a feature that sends you a muffin basket every time you upload a submission or post a comment
I'd be interested to know why you consider it "competently run". Many people who have gotten "too close" (including myself) tend to disagree. There are others who disagree just based on the fact of who's on staff. Additionally, Kihari, the actual site owner, being barely visible is concerning. Go onto the forums and find the last time he actually posted on the public forums. It was February. When the owner isn't even trying to actively involve themselves with the community (and from what I'm told, he's not much more involved behind the scenes), there's something wrong. For what it's worth, Both Kihari and Dragoneer have posted on their respective forums three times since January 3rd.
Weasyl
acknowledges it needs more features. That much is fact. The problem is they don't even have feature parity with the other "big" sites, and certainly don't offer anything unique.
That's the problem. As long as FA is online (or offline with the intent to come back online) you're going to have a hard time drawing people over and keeping them when your product is essentially a "me too" product. Nothing really functions differently than how anyone else is doing it. The "notifications" and "submissions" pages look EXACTLY LIKE FA (well, actually, FA's shows you the icon of people who followed you. Weasyl just lists this information. The whole page is just bulleted lists).
Weasyl lacks the premium features it sold people on during their fundraiser. The fact these don't exist nearly two years after the fact taints their name even further. Said features are apparently constantly tied up in development hell. Nobody there wants to just commit to them and get them done. Nobody there wants (or is able) to put their foot down and say that they need to be made a priority. Those wouldn't even be groundbreaking features.
I don't have any problems with them looking to the future, it's just there won't -be- a future if they don't put me in charge and do what I say because reasons
ftfy
I don't give two shits about ever being "in charge" of Weasyl. I am upset that the site that I, and many others, donated money towards, is now drifting along with no intention of ever becoming the site that was promised as the group of babbies running it cry in their IRC anytime Ben or I say anything about the site.
Perhaps if the people at Weasyl who thought I was out to "destroy Weasyl" and the people here who think I want to be "put in charge" combined their misguided assumptions, they'd even out and people could just realize I'm just trying to point out problems that, if fixed, would make the site better in the long run. And if you're going to post "huehuehue and how do you even know that", nobody on Weasyl's directors staff has any more experience doing this than I do. I just see things differently, and that apparently scares the hell out of them.