Author Topic: The first AUP update of 2012  (Read 586 times)

Jim Demintia

  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 628
  • E-points: +24/-6
  • Deflator Mouse
    • View Profile
The first AUP update of 2012
« on: January 19, 2012, 09:18:00 am »
So, to kick this off right:

Quote from: Sean "Word Salad" Piche
The Acceptable Upload Policy (AUP) has been updated. You can find a list of changes/updates can be found here.

Somebody hasn't chugged their Mountain Dew Amp'd for the morning. You can click through can find this:

Quote
Brief run-down of changes:

Aww, Sean, you read us, do you? Of course you do.

Anyway, it seems like he tried to address a lot of the criticisms leveled by yours truly in the previous thread. Dunno if any FAF users pointed any of the same stuff out.

What's new:

- The photography policy was yet further restricted. Pictures of, e.g. DVD collections are prohibited. Pictures of animals eating are no longer allowed. This seems to (sensibly) prohibit, say, a wild animal feeding on a carcass but is it necessary to ban a picture of, say, your Lab eating Purina Dog Chow?
- Body part photographs are not allowed. The example given suggests that this is aimed at foot fetish photographs, though I am not aware of any specific incidents that might've prompted such a ban.
- Music is further restricted to prevent uploads of trivial remixes.
- Memes are permitted, as long as they're not memes, apparently.
- A new policy requires all contributors to a work to be cited.

I am not aware of any incidents that led to any of this, most of it seems to be clarification. He says in the introduction that he contacted 60 to 70 people to get feedback on this, which seems excessive. I don't know how many responded, I can't imagine it was anywhere near that number.

So. Nothing particularly comical this time around.
Can it be this sad design
Could be the very same
A wooly man without a face
And a beast without a name

ColonThree

  • **
  • Posts: 123
  • E-points: +16/-3
  • Not a cat
    • View Profile
Re: The first AUP update of 2012
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2012, 10:32:09 am »
Pictures of animals eating are no longer allowed. This seems to (sensibly) prohibit, say, a wild animal feeding on a carcass but is it necessary to ban a picture of, say, your Lab eating Purina Dog Chow?

I think it's just badly worded.

I assume it's closer to, "Images of pets feeding/preying upon other animals (live or dead) are prohibited", as opposed to, "Images of pets feeding are prohibited, as are images of pets preying upon other animals (live or dead)".

Interestingly, audio of bodily functions is still banned unless it's "part of a narrative or song."

I'm sure that'll make for some lovely submissions.
~Witty quote~

Jim Demintia

  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 628
  • E-points: +24/-6
  • Deflator Mouse
    • View Profile
Re: The first AUP update of 2012
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2012, 11:24:58 am »
Interestingly, audio of bodily functions is still banned unless it's "part of a narrative or song."

I'm sure that'll make for some lovely submissions.

Dear lord I missed that. He actually fucking says that.

What cracks me up is that nobody probably would have thought of that otherwise. Priceless.
Can it be this sad design
Could be the very same
A wooly man without a face
And a beast without a name

Conan

  • Sean Piche Wannabe Club
  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 603
  • E-points: +33/-9
  • ¯\(°_o)/¯
    • View Profile
Re: The first AUP update of 2012
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2012, 04:12:42 pm »
The good news is he said this new comic series is good for upload.