Author Topic: Furries to be on "My Strange Addiction" (January 19th at 9PM EST, only on TLC!)  (Read 7686 times)

Jim Demintia

  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 628
  • E-points: +24/-6
  • Deflator Mouse
    • View Profile
So here's the scenario: some HR person is doing a Google search on you, the perspective hire. I don't know how common this is, or what common policies are, but let's assume it happens to you. So you have some random person Googling you, with the intent to judge your character, or to unearth anything obvious about you that could cause you to be an undue liability (distraction, or worse). This HR flack may or may not be an open-minded person, may or may not be tolerant of weirdness, and may or may not be the kind of person who is able to separate personal bias from professional responsibility. So. Assuming as little as possible about someone seeing all your weird shit for the first time, what, do you imagine, is this person going to think?

I guess that's a complicated question but Christ almighty whatever it is I don't want that person to have to subsequently have power over whether I get hired or not.

And to make this post a little more topical, don't be surprised if now or in the future there is some website or service that tracks everyone who has appeared on television in one capacity or another. I'm pretty sure Lexis Nexis already does this for cable news, it's only a matter of time before it's extended to reality/game show contestants.
Can it be this sad design
Could be the very same
A wooly man without a face
And a beast without a name

GreenReaper

  • transphobic shitheel raccoon puppetmaster
  • **
  • Posts: 124
  • E-points: +12/-23
  • Rambling norn
    • View Profile
    • GreenReaper Studios
Besides, this entire thing will blow over before the show even airs. [...] TLC's ratings will probably go up by the tiniest margin on the night the show airs from furries watching intently for the faintest beam of negative light, and absolutely nobody who isn't a furry will still be talking about it the next morning.

Probably.

Quote
If Conan hadn't crossposted it here from Flayrah, the discussion would've likely been limited to a few first- and second-degree acquaintances of the people involved, and maybe some OMG RIGHTEOUS OUTRAGE when the episode aired from the small audience of furries who obsessively scan the internet and airwaves for anything having to do with furry things (like our good buddy Karl).

Sorry, but he was pipped to the post by Furry Teens, Furtopia, furrymedia (double-posted), furryne.ws, FA (our friend Rabbi Tom apparently has a lot of readers) and even the ED forums.

I was actually rather surprised it didn't come up here earlier. You are following Flayrah's feed/Twitter/LJ/Facebook, right? ;)

Quote
the only people who care about privacy on the Internet are obviously doing naughty things

Hey, at least Google offered them an opt-out option.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2011, 08:48:24 am by GreenReaper »

Conan

  • Sean Piche Wannabe Club
  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 603
  • E-points: +33/-9
  • ¯\(°_o)/¯
    • View Profile
In the end, nobody will care about this episode being aired as much as furries will, just like how, save for a few CSI enthusiasts, nobody but furries care about "that CSI episode". It aired like, 7 years ago and since then has been banished to the realm of basic cable where it slowly fades into obscurity as more episodes come out and it repeats less often. But that doesn't stop furries from bringing it up any time Channel 7 from Bumblefuck, ND wants to do a piece about the local furry convention.

Furthermore, furries really need to stop with this "we need to manipulate the media" thing. It doesn't work and it never will. It's absolutely ridiculous what some conventions have in place when it comes to press coverage. For whatever reason, it seems the media wasn't allowed in Anthrocon last summer. That didn't stop the press, who just shot video outside and was able to get freaky shit like this. And the mean TV people even still made fun of them hundreds of miles away because they saw right through the "mascot convention" thing. Who knows, maybe the media didn't even ask for permission to shoot inside the convention center because they were tired of having some basement dweller tell them how to do their job and what they can and can not film or ask.

ProvincialTwit

  • Abuse Dept.
  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 774
  • E-points: +72/-33
    • View Profile
A man sits bolt-upright in bed, shaking like a struck drum amidst the faint violet of a snow-covered night filtering through the dusty metal blinds.  This scene plays out many nights, though on most nights as he sits, steaming slightly, sweat rapidly cooling in the chilled air of the basement beyond his blankets, it is simply fear that triggers a break in his restless tossing slumber.  Fear of many things, rational things, yes, like death and poverty, or the pipes freezing to burst and fill the walls with icy waters and black mold.  But more pressing are the crippling phobias of discovery by his peers of the sorts of websites he frequents or text-based multi-user adventures he partakes in.  Prejudices of those who simply do not understand the beauty and poetry of the shapes and forms dancing behind his eyes or across a computer screen.  He fears judgement and, perhaps, retribution, though socially he risks little in the way of repercussions aside from occasional glances now and again from among the world of strangers beyond his door.  No, this night is different, this sobering snap from sleep brought on not by fears or any sort, but by anger.  Ignoring the frigid concrete floor, he shuffles in the dim pre-dawn echos of light to his pride and joy, his one gateway of safety beyond the damp grey walls, his computer.  The machine is already on; it is always on and ready and at the bidding of its master, and even now it waits patiently for his command.  With haste, he activates the screen, artificial light penetrating the gloom to confirm the source of his anger. 

He was right to awaken when he did.  The world is wrong, and he alone must chime in against the transgressors.

Someone has said something mean about furries on the Internet.

bridgeportcat

  • Posts: 28
  • E-points: +4/-2
  • Fuck this shit a fuck gay
    • View Profile
Every non-furry I know who has mentioned the Tyra episode has just sort of shrugged their shoulders. A lot of furries sort of need to realize the same thing most other obscure fetishists have: no one really gives a shit about our weirdo crap. Seriously, they don't.
I don't time for shitfucks. Later, fuckshits.

Pi

  • POOR IMPULSE CONTROL
  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 614
  • E-points: +40/-10
  • <blink>yes hello</blink>
    • View Profile
    • Clan Spum userpage
Every non-furry I know who has mentioned the Tyra episode

OTOH, you know people who watch the Tyra Banks show.
"we did farts.  now we do sperm.  we are cutting edge." — Theo DeRaadt

Jim Demintia

  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 628
  • E-points: +24/-6
  • Deflator Mouse
    • View Profile
A man sits bolt-upright in bed, shaking like a struck drum amidst the faint violet of a snow-covered night filtering through the dusty metal blinds. 

Was there a replica of a hooved mammal, made out of hollow, thin plastic, in the corner, looking a little worse for wear? (don't want to set off his Google Alerts, you know)
Can it be this sad design
Could be the very same
A wooly man without a face
And a beast without a name

UncreativeUsername

  • *
  • Posts: 50
  • E-points: +1/-4
  • Booze IS food
    • View Profile
In the end, nobody will care about this episode being aired as much as furries will, just like how, save for a few CSI enthusiasts, nobody but furries care about "that CSI episode".

Furries actually have damned good reason to be upset with that. Furries keep having to explain to people how the fandom is not like how it is portrayed in CSI. So many people who are introduced to a furry ask, "Oh, you're the guys who yiff in fursuits?" or "Is it anything like the CSI episode?" For many people that CSI episode is the only introduction they have to the fandom before I or someone else familiar with it comes along. Though I guess running into a crazy furry would be just as bad or worse than the CSI episode.

Also, in reference to another post below Conan's, you're a pretty good writer, ProvincialTwit.

Jim Demintia

  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 628
  • E-points: +24/-6
  • Deflator Mouse
    • View Profile
Furries actually have damned good reason to be upset with that. Furries keep having to explain to people how the fandom is not like how it is portrayed in CSI.

So who's holding a gun to your head, making you give a shit?
Can it be this sad design
Could be the very same
A wooly man without a face
And a beast without a name

AshleyAshes

  • *
  • Posts: 86
  • E-points: +4/-14
    • View Profile
Furries keep having to explain to people how the fandom is not like how it is portrayed in CSI.

Yeah, CSI portrayed the furry fandom as being a group of sex centered, dramatic fucktards, who live behind fantasy characters because they dislike their own reality.  Meanwhile, what the furry fandom is really like is... OH WAIT.

Fiz

  • nice
  • Cabalistic Fuckhead
  • *
  • Posts: 94
  • E-points: +13/-1
  • no stop
    • View Profile
In the end, nobody will care about this episode being aired as much as furries will, just like how, save for a few CSI enthusiasts, nobody but furries care about "that CSI episode".

Furries actually have damned good reason to be upset with that. Furries keep having to explain to people how the fandom is not like how it is portrayed in CSI. So many people who are introduced to a furry ask, "Oh, you're the guys who yiff in fursuits?" or "Is it anything like the CSI episode?" For many people that CSI episode is the only introduction they have to the fandom before I or someone else familiar with it comes along. Though I guess running into a crazy furry would be just as bad or worse than the CSI episode.

Also, in reference to another post below Conan's, you're a pretty good writer, ProvincialTwit.

who the fuck cares about csi
pee

rodox_video

  • ***
  • Posts: 486
  • E-points: +32/-8
  • HURF DURF DUH BLUH
    • View Profile
Zeriara is part of a series on Whores.

UncreativeUsername

  • *
  • Posts: 50
  • E-points: +1/-4
  • Booze IS food
    • View Profile
Furries keep having to explain to people how the fandom is not like how it is portrayed in CSI.

Yeah, CSI portrayed the furry fandom as being a group of sex centered, dramatic fucktards, who live behind fantasy characters because they dislike their own reality.  Meanwhile, what the furry fandom is really like is... OH WAIT.

Actually, I was speaking more about the impression furries tend to have sex in fursuits. That's what everyone seems to take away from it. Obviously, there are furries who do that sort of thing, but I haven't noticed it being as rampant as people think it is after seeing the CSI episode. Though I suppose there are far worse stereotypes the fandom could have than fursuit sex.

Anyway, CSI was more popular than this show will be. Not many people will be exposed to it. I'm sure it will cause a little PR damage but nothing so widespread as the CSI show.

Jim Demintia

  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 628
  • E-points: +24/-6
  • Deflator Mouse
    • View Profile
Actually, I was speaking more about the impression furries tend to have sex in fursuits. That's what everyone seems to take away from it. Obviously, there are furries who do that sort of thing, but I haven't noticed it being as rampant as people think it is after seeing the CSI episode. Though I suppose there are far worse stereotypes the fandom could have than fursuit sex.

AGAIN

THE QUESTION IS POSED

WHO GIVES A SHIT?
Can it be this sad design
Could be the very same
A wooly man without a face
And a beast without a name

Heimdal

  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • E-points: +1/-2
    • View Profile
    • DA Account
Quote
Actually, I was speaking more about the impression furries tend to have sex in fursuits. That's what everyone seems to take away from it. Obviously, there are furries who do that sort of thing, but I haven't noticed it being as rampant as people think it is after seeing the CSI episode. Though I suppose there are far worse stereotypes the fandom could have than fursuit sex.

Anyway, CSI was more popular than this show will be. Not many people will be exposed to it. I'm sure it will cause a little PR damage but nothing so widespread as the CSI show.

That CSI episode lead to furries spouting dozen of anecdotes on how it's spread ignorant stereotypes. Dozens of anecdotes = shit.

Generally speaking, nobody actually cared.
"I eat all my Megabran!"

bridgeportcat

  • Posts: 28
  • E-points: +4/-2
  • Fuck this shit a fuck gay
    • View Profile
Furries actually have damned good reason to be upset with that. Furries keep having to explain to people how the fandom is not like how it is portrayed in CSI. So many people who are introduced to a furry ask, "Oh, you're the guys who yiff in fursuits?" or "Is it anything like the CSI episode?" For many people that CSI episode is the only introduction they have to the fandom before I or someone else familiar with it comes along. Though I guess running into a crazy furry would be just as bad or worse than the CSI episode.

Also, in reference to another post below Conan's, you're a pretty good writer, ProvincialTwit.

MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE CSI EPISODE:

Mom: Hey, You're one of those, right? A furry.

Me: Yep.

Mom: Does that stuff happen with Furries?

Me: Eh, yeah, I've seen it.

Mom: Ah, ok! Just curious. So, how's school?

THE FUCKING END

Case in point: The only people who gave a shit about that episode were furries. THE END.
I don't time for shitfucks. Later, fuckshits.

Jim Demintia

  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 628
  • E-points: +24/-6
  • Deflator Mouse
    • View Profile
My parents are not 70-plus years old, and do not watch CBS. So there you go.

And you know, even if they did see something about furries on TV (because I am sad to report they do occasionally watch TLC—haha, Learning Channel, 'member that?), they aren't likely to care. I am doing well in life and school and I am in a stable relationship. What goes on in my life is so far from what you see of furries on TV that they won't even connect "those" furries to me. I am a quiet and generally boring person.
Can it be this sad design
Could be the very same
A wooly man without a face
And a beast without a name

Lazarian

  • *
  • Posts: 48
  • E-points: +4/-4
    • View Profile
The FA forums are back up, and there is a thread on this topic...

http://forums.furaffinity.net/threads/88818-The-next-chewfox


MazelTovCocktail

  • **
  • Posts: 168
  • E-points: +5/-2
  • You smell somethin', Rabbit?
    • View Profile
In the end, nobody will care about this episode being aired as much as furries will, just like how, save for a few CSI enthusiasts, nobody but furries care about "that CSI episode".

Furries actually have damned good reason to be upset with that.

No.  They don't.
I don't like to hit little bitches with glasses, but when midgets step up, I stomp midget asses.

Jim Demintia

  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 628
  • E-points: +24/-6
  • Deflator Mouse
    • View Profile
Aaaand Twitter goes nuts as furries are once again taken COMPLETELY BY SURPRISE (this thread is what, two weeks old?) and thus begins the playback of the tape you've seen so many many times before.

DON'T EVER GO ON TV, EVER. BE YOURSELF. etc. and so forth.

I'm not entirely convinced Twitter isn't run off of some genius AI program somewhere, probably written in the '70s on punch cards. It's that fucking predictable.
Can it be this sad design
Could be the very same
A wooly man without a face
And a beast without a name