Author Topic: New FA admin has photograph of dog dick in gallery  (Read 5717 times)

a pigeon

  • Cabalistic Fuckhead
  • ***
  • Posts: 426
  • E-points: +36/-4
    • View Profile
New FA admin has photograph of dog dick in gallery
« on: April 29, 2010, 06:39:01 am »
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/chasevrocket/ is the latest FA admin.

It's against the FA AUP to upload photographs of animal genitalia. Not to mention that talking about having sex with dogs and so forth should in theory get people banned for it.

Guess what Chasevrocket has a photograph of in his gallery:

www.furaffinity.net/view/995433/

http://i41.tinypic.com/110elgl.gif

NSFW DOG DICKS

Other things:

"Heh heh, don't get me started on getting dogs off. ;3"

www.furaffinity.net/view/738042/#cid:4752625

http://i41.tinypic.com/2598mlf.jpg
-

"intimately familiar with dog cock. =)"

http://www.furaffinity.net/view/738042/#cid:4887382

http://i39.tinypic.com/axfsq9.jpg


I got most of this from a thread on lulz.net:

http://www.lulz.net/furi/res/1043971.html#1045118

So it's yet another case of hypocrisy and incompetence at Princess Piche's olive gardens.
then he hent that noble prince by the hand,
and said "welcome my soueraigne King HENERY!
chalenge thy Herytage and thy Land,
that thine owne is, and thine shall bee."

Pi

  • POOR IMPULSE CONTROL
  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 621
  • E-points: +46/-10
  • <blink>yes hello</blink>
    • View Profile
    • Clan Spum userpage
Re: New FA admin has photograph of dog dick in gallery
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2010, 07:39:41 am »
weeeeeeeeeeeelllllp.
"we did farts.  now we do sperm.  we are cutting edge." Theo DeRaadt

LordNagetiere

  • ***
  • Posts: 392
  • E-points: +12/-16
    • View Profile
Re: New FA admin has photograph of dog dick in gallery
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2010, 10:56:41 am »
In the first image I thought it was just e-penis comparison as measured by tolerance "I'm more accepting than y'all because I have more far out fetishes". Kind of like a hugbox braggart. But then...

You know what, just fuck it, they're everywhere in this goddamn fandom. Can't walk five feet in a convention space without having your air polluted by a dalmatian diddler anymore.
random gay furry art is broken , when will it be fixed ?

rodox_video

  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 505
  • E-points: +34/-8
  • HURF DURF DUH BLUH
    • View Profile
Zeriara is part of a series on Whores.

a pigeon

  • Cabalistic Fuckhead
  • ***
  • Posts: 426
  • E-points: +36/-4
    • View Profile
Re: New FA admin has photograph of dog dick in gallery
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2010, 06:36:11 am »
As well as lulz.net, someone also posted it on that Furrydrama_2 livejournal community. It seems that Chase V Rocket had come up a few days before that, since someone found another comment of his on FA about dog-dicks and there he outright denied that he had ever had sex with a non-human animal. Not only all this, but someone also pointed out that Chase V Rocket boasted that he had literally killed a man in the comments on the dog dick picture and that he might have to do again when he became a police officer.

Dragoneer turned up on the Furrydrama_2 thread complaining that no one had told him about this beforehand and he was sure that it wasn't really as bad as it looked and he'd get Chase to clarify this whole thing. Chase did so by posting a journal here:

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/1371355/

Quote
When I was a teenager, I did experiment with an animal. I related it to me being into anthropomorphic animals, etc. but it wasn't an enjoyable experience and I have no desire to ever do it again. Comments I've made to others are generally banter to provoke conversation and encourage them to like me and rouse them, regardless of what it's about."

When it was pointed out that he had lied about not having sex with a non-human animal he used tortuous equivocation to try and justify it:

Quote
The quote was "No, I do not engage in sexual acts with real animals." The question I was asked was whether or not I am a "dogfucker" in real life. The answer is accurate as I do not participate in those things. It's not who I am.

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/1371355/#cid:11501736

Quote
They asked me if I was a dogfucker. I felt that I was not and thus my answer."

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/1371355/#cid:11502187

A response to him:

Quote
There is very little sincerity here you claimed just yesterday to 'not be a dog fucker' and yes I agree with context BUT in this journal you yourself pointed out to Clayton how context of wording shouldn't be manipulated. You purposely worded things in present tense knowing you where not being fully truthful hoping for a more favorable outcome on your end. You where looking out for your best interest and not the interest of this site or it's rules.

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/1371355/#cid:11507606

He flatly insisted in the comments, no matter what, that he wasn't technically lying and that anything he said about dog dicks was just trying to excite people and make himself popular and so forth. Unable to let go of this issue, Chasevrocket posted another journal a few days later:

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/1380525/

with vague waffling about furries needing to be accepting and tolerant (of him presumably) and not rejecting anyone or judging them (he later edited it to remove the reference specifically to furries). When someone said in the comments that it is sometimes ok to judge people and/or reject them he responded:

Quote
I'm sorry that whenever you hear me speak that you cannot help but to comment and warp everything I say into something ugly.

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/1380525/#cid:11587686

And then that got him a comment which I guess neatly sums this all up:

Quote
No chase,

You don't get to do that. You don't get to sweep any critical comment under the carpet by indulging in passive aggressive relabelling of opinions you do not like.

You're an admin, man up about it already. Face up to the fact that you got caught for a number of issues and realise that at this point you're just compounding problems by insisting that anyone who doesn't share your beliefs on the matter is somehow a bad person.

Read http://www.plausiblydeniable.com/opinion/gsf.html Your wordy journal isn't just bad spin doctoring, it's Geek social Fallacy 1 in action and Geek social fallacy is hypocrisy because it's basically "ostracision or objection to what people do is bad, but it's okay to ostracise anyone who doesn't accept everything we do no matter how socially unacceptable it is".

I felt sorry for you when this debacle started, now I just think you've been dumped into a situation you can't handle but instead of recognising it, you've pulled out that shovel and started digging the hole even deeper as if that will help.

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/1380525/#cid:11587807

Chasevrocket blocked them. He has now wrapped himself in the mantle of tolerant furs and the anti-drama llama movement, by posting their icons on his userpage and by adding this to his profile:

Quote
[Profile Information]: This account is the representation of the fictional character Chase Rocket. All comments made by this account are being made under this persona and SHOULD NOT be taken seriously unless otherwise directly specified. My goal here is to have fun with you and become friends or playful rivals as part of a friendly role-play as a mischievous villain who works for Team Rocket. Artwork submitted may be mature/adult in nature as well as this character's theme. If for some reason you come to feel harassed by me, let me know and I'll stop immediately - I intend no ill-will to anyone on Fur Affinity regardless of personal preferences, orientations, fetishes, etc.

Locking the door after the dog has bolted I suppose.
then he hent that noble prince by the hand,
and said "welcome my soueraigne King HENERY!
chalenge thy Herytage and thy Land,
that thine owne is, and thine shall bee."

u63r

  • *
  • Posts: 33
  • E-points: +1/-7
    • View Profile
Re: New FA admin has photograph of dog dick in gallery
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2010, 06:38:00 pm »
"It's not me! It's my murrsona! Yeah, that's it!"

MazelTovCocktail

  • **
  • Posts: 168
  • E-points: +5/-2
  • You smell somethin', Rabbit?
    • View Profile
Re: New FA admin has photograph of dog dick in gallery
« Reply #6 on: May 05, 2010, 06:46:41 pm »
I see that he also banned the Intolerant-Furs group.

Isn't it a bit hypocritical to preach tolerance and acceptance, then reject those with a different viewpoint?  I mean, that's intolerance.
I don't like to hit little bitches with glasses, but when midgets step up, I stomp midget asses.

Heimdal

  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • E-points: +1/-2
    • View Profile
    • DA Account
Re: New FA admin has photograph of dog dick in gallery
« Reply #7 on: May 05, 2010, 08:25:51 pm »
Isn't it a bit hypocritical to preach tolerance and acceptance, then reject those with a different viewpoint?  I mean, that's intolerance.

Tolerance is when people do what you tell them to do. Come on, most furries know that!
"I eat all my Megabran!"

u63r

  • *
  • Posts: 33
  • E-points: +1/-7
    • View Profile
Re: New FA admin has photograph of dog dick in gallery
« Reply #8 on: May 07, 2010, 03:58:13 pm »
Isn't it a bit hypocritical to preach tolerance and acceptance, then reject those with a different viewpoint?  I mean, that's intolerance.

Tolerance is when people do what you tell them to do. Come on, most furries know that!
To expand; Tolerance is when people do what you tell them. Intolerance is when they tell you to do stuff you don't want to.

rodox_video

  • Postcount ate Whippany, NJ
  • ****
  • Posts: 505
  • E-points: +34/-8
  • HURF DURF DUH BLUH
    • View Profile
Re: New FA admin has photograph of dog dick in gallery
« Reply #9 on: May 07, 2010, 10:33:35 pm »
Zeriara is part of a series on Whores.

Freehaven

  • LOLS AND DONGS WHOLESALE
  • ***
  • Posts: 323
  • E-points: +12/-28
    • View Profile
Re: New FA admin has photograph of dog dick in gallery
« Reply #10 on: May 11, 2010, 09:00:09 am »
Isn't it a bit hypocritical to preach tolerance and acceptance, then reject those with a different viewpoint?

Yes.  Yes, it is.