The last fallout of this I suppose, after getting permabanned from FA, Arcturus took himself to inkbunny where he posted a journal explaining his side of the story:
Why I'm not on FA anymore, an explanation
I'm posting this here solely so that people know the exact reason that I was kicked off of FurAffinity. Try not to start up a dramabomb. Here's the email from FA (and presumably, Dragoneer), as to why:
--
Due to continued problems over nearly six years on the site, we feel it is best
if Fur Affinity and yourself part ways, especially given recent issues between
yourself, FA and other guests of the site. We have chosen to move forward with
our relationship. Per the Terms of Service, "We reserve the right to suspend or
terminate any account without notice."
We thank you for your understanding,
The FA Staff
--
So.. no reason at all, except they just didn't want me there. Well, I hope that in the years to come, Starling
doesn't kick me off. If he ever did, he'd be a BAD PUPPY.
http://inkbunny.net/journalview.php?id=2025The owner of inkbunny, Starling, said in the comments:
If anyone starts makin' drama in this here journal, bad things happen to them, no matter which side of the issue they are on.
Dragoneer and Maddogairpirate became irate over Arcturus' journal and complained on furrydrama_2, making several posts, that Starling was protecting Arcturus, e.g:
I get it. I read what he wrote loud and clear. =/
If he wants to protect Arc that's fine, but even his journal out-and-out is a lie. The reasons for his ban a pretty clear, and have even been posted to FD_2 in the past. If he wants "no drama" then he should have stopped the journal at the start, not ban anybody who disagrees with Arc, meanwhile... we get flamed to shit.
Yeah, the position he took is clear. =|
http://community.livejournal.com/furrydrama_2/211295.html?thread=17715039#t17715039Dragoneer, I have a question for you.
Provided that we can clearly show Arcturus is delivering falsehoods, would you at all be interested in pursuing a libel charge? A charge, which, I would imagine, would also take Inkbunny to task for harboring said disinformation as I have no problem, none whatsoever, in showing that Arcturus is making a false statement and is censoring evidence to the contrary, and that Inkbunny is aware and condones such actions?
http://community.livejournal.com/furrydrama_2/211295.html?thread=17767007#t17767007(He was not interested in pursuing a charge)
Maddogairpirate and a few other people took up the cudgels on Arcturus' journal, however on inkbunny people are allowed to delete comments from their own journal and Arcturus did so, in order to ensure that no one would contradict him (at least in his own journal). Maddogairpirate complained about allowing people to delete comments on FD_2, e.g:
That, by the way, is precisely what is wrong with Inkbunny policy. The fact that a user can control information, be it correct or incorrect, and remain untouched, is a problem.
A moderator of Inkbunny responded to them with a few posts, most relevant parts of two of them:
It is not for staff to decide who is right in an argument to which we are not a party, or to act on our own opinions of the issue or the poster. Our job is to ensure the post and discussion does not get out of hand, as specified by the site rules.
http://community.livejournal.com/furrydrama_2/211295.html?thread=17762655#t17762655As I have indicated, we are not in the business of determining the "truth" of what people post to Inkbunny. Frankly, we have much better things to do with our time.
A person's journal, and their page, is to a large extent "their space". You have the right to reply, but in your own space.
http://community.livejournal.com/furrydrama_2/211295.html?thread=17766751#t17766751Maddogairpirate summed up his view of the situation:
Starling doesn't want any bombastic commentary. But Arcturus claims that he was permabanned for no good reason (an inflammatory statement, we can agree with this). So it's already bombastic, and he steps in to defend Arc's right to say it and to moderate any responses.
*I* come in with factual corrections. Not bombastic commentry, really. Facts are facts.
Arc censors me and blocks me from posting.
DO YOU SEE ANY PROBLEM WITH THIS? ANY? ANY AT ALL?
He is allowing Arc to make bombastic commentary up front that cannot be challenged.
http://community.livejournal.com/furrydrama_2/212393.html?thread=17800873#t17800873And made a reply to Arcturus' journal with a journal of his own:
http://inkbunny.net/journalview.php?id=2061It strikes me that if you look at Arcturus' journal on inkbunny, so few people respond to it (amongst them
Blazger) that if he'd been ignored nothing would have come of it. FA certainly was not "flamed to shit" as Dragoneer claimed.