I think the important thing to remember, here, is that FurFright (at least, when I went a few years ago) is absolutely minuscule compared to the major dramafests. It's also in the middle of nowhere, Connecticut; though I don't think it falls particularly close to any of the more populous cons date-wise.
There seem to be multiple critical mass levels at furry conventions. When they're particularly small, only the locals and the totally devoted are going to show up; additionally, small tends to equal new, so chances are the real nutjob populations haven't even heard of such a con. As the yearly attendance surpasses these critical mass levels, the con itself attracts a greater number of crazies. Pop. > X, and fursuiters show up. Pop. > Y, and the bondage crowd makes an appearance. Pop. > Z, and the babyfurs invade. The big-name cons like KageFest in PA and LamePunCon in the Bay area have surpassed all known critical mass levels, and as such, every freaky sub-sub-culture of furry is represented en masse.
So, yes, it's an overly kind article that paints the fetish culture in a shining positive light. Have that reporter come back in a couple years and, without the anti-media-blitz spin-doctoring* skills of our favorite gay cockroach, I'm willing to bet the article won't be quite so kind.
*(Is that what his Ph.D. is in?)